Tekstit

Näytetään blogitekstit, joiden ajankohta on tammikuu, 2018.

CASE 2

CASE 2 A: McDonalds:  McDonalds made the training fun by using a game that would inspire the worker, but also give a realistic real-life situation. It went so well that the game was played by outsiders as well, which proves that the game was made in such a fun way, that outside people would play it just for fun.  By using new technology, the training process is developing, and getting more time and money efficient. This way, the companies doesn’t have to invest a lot of money in a training session which wouldn’t end up teaching the employees anything new, which again would be a waste of the company’s valuable time and money.  McDonald’s has proven here that developing company tactics at the same time with the rapid changes in the world, is a good thing. CASE 2 B: Nando's: Nando’s invested in a lot of different training sessions, for different type of purposes, all the way from new employees, to managing directors. The investment...

CASE 1

The problem they now have, after the damage has already been done, is how to get back from what they did, since the world has realized what they did isn’t okay, and that beautiful is seen in so many ways, that there are different kinds off beautiful. A big thing is also the size of the person, they could qualify by the hair and facial features, but if they are even a bit bigger than average it's not even possible to recruit them, since they are supposed to be wearing the company's clothes, and the company only makes up to size L, which is a size M in the real world. The biggest problem with the company's recruitment process was , according to me, that they didn't think a few years into the future, and maybe try to predict that the way they were doing things wouldn't work in the future. That they only chose sales associates according to their appearance, and that there was only one specific kind of beautiful according to Abercrombie & Fitch. They had to be m...